[1.32 Plan] release status?

From what Alexsey stated last week, I understand we are now in a position to inspect results for all the relevant
Hi all, I have only limited access to the list these days, so my apologies if there's been some progress in this area that I missed to read about. Are we ready to schedule a final deadline for branching? platforms, and the turnaround cycle is kept under a healthy 24 hours. The issues reports show regressions (red cells) for only five libraries, and the number of yellow cells is, IMHO, resonable, given the many exotic compilers that have been recently introduced in the regression tests. OTOH, the release date has slipped over three weeks now, and I guess we cannot just go on forever fixing things, as it is not realistic to expect that every issue be resolved in a reasonable amount of time. Maybe having some fixed schedule for branching will help concentrate on those problems that are really important. Just my 2 cents. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
Hi all,
I have only limited access to the list these days, so my apologies if there's been some progress in this area that I missed to read about.
From what Alexsey stated last week, I understand we are now in a position to inspect results for all the relevant
Are we ready to schedule a final deadline for branching? platforms, and the turnaround cycle is kept under a healthy 24 hours. The issues reports show regressions (red cells) for only five libraries, and the number of yellow cells is, IMHO, resonable, given the many exotic compilers that have been recently introduced in the regression tests.
OTOH, the release date has slipped over three weeks now, and I guess we cannot just go on forever fixing things, as it is not realistic to expect that every issue be resolved in a reasonable amount of time.
Also, we're not neccessarily required to have all regressions fixed before the branch. That's what the post-branch pre-release period is for. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
participants (2)
-
David Abrahams
-
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z