I'm trying to get a Boost review scheduled for the proposed Boost.OpenMethod. I sent an email directly to review wizards but haven't gotten a response. Can anyone help me get in touch with the wizards?
I'm trying to get a Boost review scheduled for the proposed Boost.OpenMethod. I sent an email directly to review wizards but haven't gotten a response. Can anyone help me get in touch with the wizards?
Since it seems as though we have found a single point of failure in our review process I would like to volunteer to be an additional Review Wizard. I'm not exactly sure if there's a process for such a thing. Prior to my work at the CPPAlliance I spent plenty of time as a Project Manager, and I have a Master's Degree in Engineering Management so I believe I can handle the scope of responsibilities laid out here: https://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html. Matt
On Thursday, April 3rd, 2025 at 11:08 AM, Matt Borland <matt@mattborland.com> wrote:
I'm trying to get a Boost review scheduled for the proposed
Boost.OpenMethod. I sent an email directly to review wizards but haven't gotten a response. Can anyone help me get in touch with the wizards?
Since it seems as though we have found a single point of failure in our review process I would like to volunteer to be an additional Review Wizard. I'm not exactly sure if there's a process for such a thing. Prior to my work at the CPPAlliance I spent plenty of time as a Project Manager, and I have a Master's Degree in Engineering Management so I believe I can handle the scope of responsibilities laid out here: https://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html.
Matt
Following up on this since it's been a few days. Does anyone oppose me taking up the role of an additional review manager? If not, I'll get the review of OpenMethod on the calendar. Thanks, Matt
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 1:09 PM Matt Borland via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Following up on this since it's been a few days. Does anyone oppose me taking up the role of an additional review manager? If not, I'll get the review of OpenMethod on the calendar.
I definitely do not oppose it. :-) -- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supongas Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
I'm trying to get a Boost review scheduled for the proposed Boost.OpenMethod. I sent an email directly to review wizards but haven't gotten a response. Can anyone help me get in touch with the wizards?
Since it seems as though there's no opposition to me serving as a review wizard, I have talked with Dmitry and we scheduled the review of OpenMethod for 28 April to 7 May 2025. As always, in the interest of full disclosure Dmitry and I are both CPPAlliance employees. Their is neither personal nor corporate benefit for us to theoretically manipulate the review process, therefore, I do not foresee any issues. Thank you, Matt
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 21:01, Matt Borland via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I'm trying to get a Boost review scheduled for the proposed Boost.OpenMethod. I sent an email directly to review wizards but haven't gotten a response. Can anyone help me get in touch with the wizards?
Since it seems as though there's no opposition to me serving as a review wizard, I have talked with Dmitry and we scheduled the review of OpenMethod for 28 April to 7 May 2025. As always, in the interest of full disclosure Dmitry and I are both CPPAlliance employees. Their is neither personal nor corporate benefit for us to theoretically manipulate the review process, therefore, I do not foresee any issues.
Matt, My apologies for being non-responsive and missing your message, I must have lost it in action. Lately, I haven't been very active in the Boost community, mostly due to technology switch on my end that dragged me out of the C++ ecosystem, at least for quite some time. Although I'm happy to try keep serving as one of the review wizards, I'd be even happier if the Boost community agreed on including someone else, especially someone active in Boost. Thank you for the will to help with this. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
participants (5)
-
Christian Mazakas -
Mateusz Loskot -
Matt Borland -
René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -
Дмитрий Архипов