Hello Ruyong, I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it calmly and would try to understand. 1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs . So I used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal. 2. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are the things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves maths and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not faking my interest toward them as you can check by following the links that I have given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you want to say no-one other than you can like both. 3. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make sense for me,cause we are applying for different Projects. 4. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you start describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it in your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function which is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , have we both copied from google ?? And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns the whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, before creating this nuisance. Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because borrowing ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway. I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes Thanks Satyam Pandey On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Satyam Pandey wrote:

Hello Ruyong, I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it calmly and would try to understand.

1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs . So I used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal. 2. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are the things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves maths and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not faking my interest toward them as you can check by following the links that I have given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you want to say no-one other than you can like both. 3. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make sense for me,cause we are applying for different Projects. 4. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you start describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it in your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function which is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , have we both copied from google ??

And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns the whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, before creating this nuisance. Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because borrowing ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway.

I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes

Thanks Satyam Pandey.

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ruoyun Jing wrote:

...

Hi Satyam, Your proposal is same as me especially on milestone and programming test. I received two emails from google docs. Sorry for my language is Chinese. The meaning of this email is Satyam Pandey do a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+”

On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Satyam Pandey (Google 文档) < d+MTA0OTYzMTEyNjU1MDQ4ODM2NjY4-MTE2NjIwMzk2NDMwMjUwNDI3 MDcx@docs.google.com> wrote:

...

Satyam Pandey向“Proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document ”添加了一条建议 [image: Satyam Pandey] Satyam Pandey

替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”替换为“`+”

打开 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=suggestion_email_discussion Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了有关“Proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document ”的所有讨论。更改 Google 文档向您发送的内容。 https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k&title=Proposal 您可以通过回复此邮件来参与讨论。

-- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321@gmail.com

The meaning of this email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” 2017-04-02 21:03 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey (Google 文档) < d+MTA0OTYzMTEyNjU1MDQ4ODM2NjY4-MTE2NjIwMzk2NDMwMjUwNDI3 MDcx@docs.google.com>:

...

Satyam Pandey拒绝了“Proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document ”中的建议 [image: Satyam Pandey] Satyam Pandey

替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”替换为“`+”

[image: Satyam Pandey] Satyam Pandey

*已拒绝建议* 打开 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=suggestion_email_discussion Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了有关“Proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document ”的所有讨论。更改 Google 文档向您发送的内容。 https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k&title=Proposal 您可以通过回复此邮件来参与讨论。

I think I need you to give some explanation.

-- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321@gmail.com