Re: [boost] Boost Units library preview

-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Andy Little Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:08 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Units library preview
...
I need more docs and at least to be able to run the code to form an opinion.
I've been using gcc 4.0 on Mac OS X 10.4 as my development and test platform. The code should work with gcc 4.x on any platform but I'm not at that stage of development yet. I do have MSVC 2005 though and should probably get it working with that compile also.
That's quite a general criticism, but obviously there is not enough detail there either for me to be able to respond to it in any meaningful way.
Can you be more specific? What details are you missing? I think I've implemented and tested everything except the metric prefix metafunctions. Eric.

"Eric Lemings" <lemings@roguewave.com> wrote in message news:D730FF7CEDDCA64483F9E99D999A158B4203C2@qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com...
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Andy Little Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:08 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Units library preview
...
I need more docs and at least to be able to run the code to form an opinion.
I've been using gcc 4.0 on Mac OS X 10.4 as my development and test platform. The code should work with gcc 4.x on any platform but I'm not at that stage of development yet. I do have MSVC 2005 though and should probably get it working with that compile also.
That's quite a general criticism, but obviously there is not enough detail there either for me to be able to respond to it in any meaningful way.
Can you be more specific? What details are you missing? I think I've implemented and tested everything except the metric prefix metafunctions.
You've lost me now I'm afraid. Specific about what? Details of what? regards Andy Little
participants (2)
-
Andy Little
-
Eric Lemings