Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0bydefault for all msvc toolsets
I read about people running into them frequently enough on internal discussion aliases at microsoft (where I work) and recall just last week I believe someone who ran into a perf issue on this newgroup while writing a sorting algorithm ------Original Message------ From: Emil Dotchevski Sender: To: boost@lists.boost.org ReplyTo: boost@lists.boost.org Sent: Dec 20, 2008 12:13 AM Subject: Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0bydefault for all msvc toolsets On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:34 PM, <raindog@macrohmasheen.com> wrote:
The checks are however a huge performance hit that people tend to be caught by surprise with.
Not my experience. The checks do affect performance, but rarely enough to get on my radar. I do like having them on by default. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
I read about people running into them frequently enough on internal discussion aliases at microsoft (where I work) and recall just last week I believe someone who ran into a perf issue on this newgroup while writing a sorting algorithm
That was me and the performance difference is significant with _SECURE_SCL=0. I leave it on for debug only. -- EA
participants (2)
-
Edouard A. -
raindog＠macrohmasheen.com