This change <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/40271/trunk/libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2> means that the Boost.Test library is no longer tested as part of the regression tests run from trunk/status/Jamfile.v2. Is this intentional? If not please fix this. If it is intentional, please notify the testers that they may need to delete the Boost.Test results if the are running incremental tests. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
"Rene Rivera" <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote in message news:472A4702.906@gmail.com...
This change <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/40271/trunk/libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2> means that the Boost.Test library is no longer tested as part of the regression tests run from trunk/status/Jamfile.v2.
Is this intentional? If not please fix this. If it is intentional, please notify the testers that they may need to delete the Boost.Test results if the are running incremental tests.
It's not. This is what I was told to do to implement "test" target. What should be done to fix it? Gennadiy
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
"Rene Rivera" <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote in message news:472A4702.906@gmail.com...
This change <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/40271/trunk/libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2> means that the Boost.Test library is no longer tested as part of the regression tests run from trunk/status/Jamfile.v2.
Is this intentional? If not please fix this. If it is intentional, please notify the testers that they may need to delete the Boost.Test results if the are running incremental tests.
It's not. This is what I was told to do to implement "test" target.
What should be done to fix it?
Revert it. Don't wait until you have a fix. Why was this change committed? How could it have passed tests on your local machine? --Beman
On Freitag 02 November 2007, Beman Dawes wrote:
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
It's not. This is what I was told to do to implement "test" target.
See: Message-ID: <47199DC3.4040102@gmail.com> and the whole thread for the discussion leading to this. test/Jamfile-v2 now marks all targets including "test" as explicit. So it has to be explicitly called. Unfortunately, status/Jamfile.v2 simply calls build-project ../libs/test/test ; # test-suite test and therefore builds _no_ targets. Invoking build-project ../libs/test/test//test ; # test-suite test should build it again. The right way is to remove "test" from the list of "explicit" targets in test/Jamfile.v2. Else running bjam from that directory would still build no targets...
Why was this change committed? How could it have passed tests on your local machine?
Well, running the test suite from "status" would simply ignore the explicit tests and result in no failures... :-((( Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * juergen.hunold@ivembh.de ! www.ivembh.de * * Geschäftsführer: ! Sitz des Unternehmens: Hannover * Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer ! Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 56965 * PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke !
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes@acm.org> wrote in message news:472B20D1.5080503@acm.org...
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
"Rene Rivera" <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote in message news:472A4702.906@gmail.com...
This change <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/40271/trunk/libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2> means that the Boost.Test library is no longer tested as part of the regression tests run from trunk/status/Jamfile.v2.
Is this intentional? If not please fix this. If it is intentional, please notify the testers that they may need to delete the Boost.Test results if the are running incremental tests.
It's not. This is what I was told to do to implement "test" target.
What should be done to fix it?
Revert it. Don't wait until you have a fix.
Why was this change committed? How could it have passed tests on your local machine?
It works for me locally. I always run tests with explicit targets or "test" target, since I am running bjam through extra script that captures output (bjam doesn't do this). I've removed explicit rule for now. Gennadiy
participants (4)
-
Beman Dawes -
Gennadiy Rozental -
Juergen Hunold -
Rene Rivera