Review schedule too slow?
With the backlog we currently have, the current one-review-a-month, and the rate of review submissions, we are going to have some reviews pushed into 2005. I think any wait over four months is unacceptable. We going to have to speed up the review schedule, at least until the backlog is cleared. (We need at least two reviews a month. The most we can have is three, unless we allow overlap and/or shorten the review time.) -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
"Daryle Walker" <darylew@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BC675194.73DC%darylew@hotmail.com...
We going to have to speed up the review schedule, at least until the backlog is cleared. (We need at least two reviews a month. The most we can have is three, unless we allow overlap and/or shorten the review time.)
The new fast-track review should make it possible to fit 4 small libraries into a month. Btw, would it be an idea to make post on comp.lang.c++/.moderated to encourage more outsiders to participate in reviews? br Thorsten
With the backlog we currently have, the current one-review-a-month, and
"Daryle Walker" <darylew@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BC675194.73DC%darylew@hotmail.com... the
rate of review submissions, we are going to have some reviews pushed into 2005. I think any wait over four months is unacceptable. We going to have to speed up the review schedule, at least until the backlog is cleared. (We need at least two reviews a month. The most we can have is three, unless we allow overlap and/or shorten the review time.)
circular_buffer review should start on March 5th. indexed_set will follow likely although no date is set yet. /Pavel
participants (3)
-
Daryle Walker -
Pavel Vozenilek -
Thorsten Ottosen