[1.34.0] RudbekAssociates tests
Victor, I don't see your test results anywhere, and I'm positively sure I never deleted those results. The reason I'm asking is that we seem to have no test results for msvc-8.0 in known-good configuration and debug variant and I'm worried we can have regressions on a popular platform slip by. Did you just have no time to run test recently, or there's any problem I have to fix? Thanks, Volodya
Volodya, my system crashed 2 weeks ago and I'm just getting it back together... this is my backup system I'm on right now and it doesn't have the power to do the regressions. I should have some time tomorrow (Saturday) to get the primary system back up and running tests again At 12:25 2007-01-26, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Victor, I don't see your test results anywhere, and I'm positively sure I never deleted those results.
The reason I'm asking is that we seem to have no test results for msvc-8.0 in known-good configuration and debug variant and I'm worried we can have regressions on a popular platform slip by.
Did you just have no time to run test recently, or there's any problem I have to fix?
Thanks, Volodya
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
Volodya, my system crashed 2 weeks ago
Ouch! Hope nothing important was lost.
and I'm just getting it back together... this is my backup system I'm on right now and it doesn't have the power to do the regressions. I should have some time tomorrow (Saturday) to get the primary system back up and running tests again
That would be very much appreciated! Thanks, Volodya
Vladimir Prus wrote:
The reason I'm asking is that we seem to have no test results for msvc-8.0 in known-good configuration and debug variant and I'm worried we can have regressions on a popular platform slip by.
JFYI: I upgraded my msvc-8.0 (from pre-release to express edition) and scheduled a run. Altough you requested to omit the msvc-8.0 from my runs, I put it back so my results should be available for the next cycle. Roland (aka. speedsnail)
Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz@chello.at> writes:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
The reason I'm asking is that we seem to have no test results for msvc-8.0 in known-good configuration and debug variant and I'm worried we can have regressions on a popular platform slip by.
JFYI: I upgraded my msvc-8.0 (from pre-release to express edition) and scheduled a run. Altough you requested to omit the msvc-8.0 from my runs, I put it back so my results should be available for the next cycle.
I also run msvc-8.0express as part of the Just Software Solutions runs. I'm not sure why this is identified as a separate toolset from msvc-8.0 (I don't name it explicitly in user-config.jam; rather I use msvc: all), since the primary difference is in the libraries shipped, none of which affects boost. Anthony -- Anthony Williams Just Software Solutions Ltd - http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL
Anthony Williams wrote:
I also run msvc-8.0express as part of the Just Software Solutions runs. I'm not sure why this is identified as a separate toolset from msvc-8.0 (I don't name it explicitly in user-config.jam; rather I use msvc: all), since the primary difference is in the libraries shipped, none of which affects boost.
Just for the record: I am explicitely naming the compiler in user-config.jam, which possibly is why it is showing up as msvc-8.0. Roland
participants (4)
-
Anthony Williams -
Roland Schwarz -
Victor A. Wagner Jr. -
Vladimir Prus