Re: [boost] Re: [review] hash functions

13 Mar
2005
13 Mar
'05
3:11 p.m.
In-Reply-To: <d0vsa6$bkm$1@sea.gmane.org> abarbati@iaanus.com (Alberto Barbati) wrote (abridged):
In the case of (2), the platform may provide another implementation which can be used. For example, perhaps the pointers are segment+offset and the offset part is suitable. In my view, boost should be allowed to vary the implementation of the hash functions to suit the local platform. One interesting case is compacting garbage collectors. These already have problems with std::less() and I'd rather not make things worse by over-specifying hashing. -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK
7407
Age (days ago)
7407
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
brangdon@cix.compulink.co.uk