RE: [boost] Re: Problem with code in common_factor_ct.hpp

-----Original Message----- On Behalf Of David Abrahams Daryle Walker <darylew@hotmail.com> writes:
On 2/2/05 5:24 PM, "David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Daryle Walker <darylew@hotmail.com> writes:
On 1/31/05 4:29 PM, "David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
"John H. Spicer" <jhs@edg.com> writes:
This file includes the code below in an #else for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION. We give an error on
that
code
because of a missing "template" keyword (between :: and helper).
What is the proper channel for reporting things like this?
[Dave Abrahams]
Yes, we still have compilers with BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION. Not every library has officially dropped support for vc6/7 yet.
[Brian Braatz] Humble request from the "Front Lines" :) Please continue supporting vc7. I am currently in the unenviable position of BACK PORTING code that uses boost from vc7.1 to vc7. The first thing to go was lambda. The funny thing is about 6 months ago I was thinking it seemed silly to keep things like boost.bind around. But now I am using that heavily instead of lambda. My situation is we have 1.7 million lines of code we are trying to upgrade. Unfortunately we have about 40-50 people who have had vc7 purchased for them by the project and we do not have the budget to upgrade compilers. Vc7 is, in my opinion probably (unfortunately) still a compiler many folks are stuck with.
participants (1)
-
Brian Braatz