-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Bennett, Patrick Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 2:29 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Ace??? (was: ANN: POCO - C++ Portable Components)

...

-----Original Message----- [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Steven Burns Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 5:18 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Ace??? (was: ANN: POCO - C++ Portable Components)

POCO's documentation is fine, sometimes a method could deserve more explanation but it's still fine given the fact most of the classes are very intuitive. Boost documentation is usually excellent, which is mandatory because some classes are not intuitive at first sight. ACE's website is simply unfriendly and looks careless.

Poco's documentation is 'ok', but the fact that the comments for all methods are *below* the method declarations is a style disaster. [snip]

Boost docs > * But seriously, I think more libraries documented like boost would be great :)