Re: [boost] [Boost-build] another simple boost build failure

Hi Ronny, On Thursday, 25. October 2012 12:55:10 you wrote:
thanks a lot. I did not know that one has to rebuild everything after changing the requirements. It seems to work now.
Good to hear that everything is up and running.
It is true, I did not read the starting guide thoroughly, I'll do that now :-).
Good, too ;-)
I am a bit confused about the library being a static library. Shouldn't it be "boost_filesystem-vc90-mt-gds-1_50.lib" instead of "boost_filesystem-vc90-mt-gd-1_50.lib" then? Or did I get it wrong?
Ah, that is the "s" for static runtime. AFAIK the last msvc to provide a static runtime was 7.1. Don't confuse "static library" with "static runtime libraries". The static runtime opens up a new can of worms... Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! * voice: ++49 4257 300 ! Fährstraße 1 * fax : ++49 4257 300 ! 31609 Balge/Sebbenhausen * jhunold@gmx.eu ! Germany

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Jürgen Hunold <jhunold@gmx.eu> wrote:
Hi Ronny,
On Thursday, 25. October 2012 12:55:10 you wrote:
thanks a lot. I did not know that one has to rebuild everything after changing the requirements. It seems to work now.
Good to hear that everything is up and running.
It is true, I did not read the starting guide thoroughly, I'll do that now :-).
Good, too ;-)
I am a bit confused about the library being a static library. Shouldn't it be "boost_filesystem-vc90-mt-gds-1_50.lib" instead of "boost_filesystem-vc90-mt-gd-1_50.lib" then? Or did I get it wrong?
Ah, that is the "s" for static runtime. AFAIK the last msvc to provide a static runtime was 7.1. Don't confuse "static library" with "static runtime libraries". The static runtime opens up a new can of worms...
VC11 still supports static runtimes, and I'm glad they do! Olaf
participants (2)
-
Jürgen Hunold
-
Olaf van der Spek