Boost.Application new version available.
Hi All, Last version (0.4.1) of Boost.Application are available. Documentation: http://www.dokfile.com/appbeta4/docs/libs/application/doc/html/index.html http://www.dokfile.com/appbeta4/docs/libs/application/doc/html/index.html Code: https://github.com/retf/Boost.Application https://github.com/retf/Boost.Application News in this release: * Now we have a self-pipe aspect ready to use for POSIX platform. The documentation of usage: <http://www.dokfile.com/appbeta4/docs/libs/application/doc/html/boost_applic ation/posix_specifics.html#boost_application.posix_specifics.self_pipe_> http://www.dokfile.com/appbeta4/docs/libs/application/doc/html/boost_applica tion/posix_specifics.html#boost_application.posix_specifics.self_pipe_ The sample usage of aspect: <https://github.com/retf/Boost.Application/blob/master/libs/application/exam ple/selfpipe/selfpipe.cpp> https://github.com/retf/Boost.Application/blob/master/libs/application/examp le/selfpipe/selfpipe.cpp * Some fixes on code and docs. Please send your comments!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:30:12PM -0200, Renato Forti wrote:
Hi All, Last version (0.4.1) of Boost.Application are available. http://www.dokfile.com/appbeta4/docs/libs/application/doc/html/index.html
I don't know if this has been raised before in the discussion of previous versions, but it's customary to not call something just "Boost.Whatever" if it's not an actual accepted Boost library. Please try to use terms like "proposed Boost.Application library" or "my Application library" or "Forti's Application library" or something along those lines. You should probably not use the actual Boost logotype in the documentation either... there should be one somewhere with the text "provisional" or "proposed" superimposed on it. -- Lars Viklund | zao@acc.umu.se
participants (2)
-
Lars Viklund -
Renato Forti