Please may I merge changes to Boost.Range to add overloads to various Range functions to better support the use with temporary results? These changes have been tested on the trunk over the last three days without issue. Regards, Neil Groves
On 17 July 2010 13:35, Neil Groves <neil@grovescomputing.com> wrote:
Please may I merge changes to Boost.Range to add overloads to various Range functions to better support the use with temporary results? These changes have been tested on the trunk over the last three days without issue.
Yes, it looks okay to me. Daniel
Le 17/07/2010 13:35, Neil Groves wrote:
Please may I merge changes to Boost.Range to add overloads to various Range functions to better support the use with temporary results? These changes have been tested on the trunk over the last three days without issue.
Would you please also consider fixing bug #4398 that is quite important, trivial to fix, and that I reported a while ago?
participants (3)
-
Daniel James -
Mathias Gaunard -
Neil Groves