[1.33.0] Status as of July 14

We're very close to being able to release. We need to resolve the following issues before releasing: 1) Parameter library: many regressions; docs need to be finished (?) 2) Serialization library: many regressions 3) Inspection report: We don't need a fully-clean report, but we need to fix broken links, too-long file names, and files with tabs. At this time, do not commit any changes to CVS unless it: 1) Resolves a failure listed on the unresolved issues page at: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/ issues.html , 2) resolves a problem listed on the inspection page: http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/inspection_report.html 2) Is a documentation change, or 3) is on a branch. If you believe there is something critical that needs to go into this release that does not meet the above criteria, e-mail me privately. Doug

At 09:33 2005-07-14, Doug Gregor wrote:
my system will be going offline until around 2005 August 1 in less than 24 hours as I've reported previously (we're moving)
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"

"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com> writes:
my system will be going offline until around 2005 August 1 in less than 24 hours as I've reported previously (we're moving)
Thanks for all your testing contributions up 'till now, Victor! -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

Doug Gregor wrote:
If there's no one else with testing experience and access to these compilers, I could try to run the tests. 7.1 is already installed on my system, 8.0 shouldn't be much of a problem either. I vaguely remember reading a guideline how to setup a test system but I can't find this documentation right know, even through google. A link would be appreciated. Thanks & Regards, -- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.

Andreas Huber writes:
Or you could take on just 7.1 and somebody else would cover 8.0. And even "redundant" results are very valuable, as long as they are run on non-overlaping schedules.
Please see http://engineering.meta-comm.com/regression_setup/instructions.html -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

I've added 7.1 to my nightly test run, hopefully the results should appear tommorow. There has been a lot of failures retrieving the tarball again recently though. Martin -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.16/50 - Release Date: 15/07/2005

On 7/14/05, Andreas Huber <ahd6974-spamgroupstrap@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have no boost testing experience, but I have access to VC7.1 and 8.0 and two reasonable computers for running it(two Pentium IV with 1.8Ghz, 512/1024MB). If help is needed just let me know.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida Developer from synergy and Computer Science student from State University of Campinas(UNICAMP). Unicamp: http://www.ic.unicamp.br Synergy: http://www.synergy.com.br "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."

Victor A. Wagner Jr. writes:
my system will be going offline until around 2005 August 1 in less than 24 hours as I've reported previously (we're moving)
Thanks for the heads up. Is somebody else able/willing to pick up regular VC 7.1/8.0 regression testing? -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> writes:
If nobody else jumps up to volunteer, I could do it. I'd have to set up vc8 on my older machine and get regression.py going. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

I have these compilers and Intel 9.0. I'm also quite willing to help but someone needs to give me a heads up on procedures. Cheers, Goncalo
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Goncalo N M de Carvalho writes:
I have these compilers and Intel 9.0.
I'm also quite willing to help
Wonderful!
but someone needs to give me a heads up on procedures.
Please see http://engineering.meta-comm.com/regression_setup/instructions.html for the instructions on the regression setup itself and http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started.html#Tools for the toolset configuration info. If you have any problems with the setup, please feel free to ask for help here or on the Boost.Testing list (http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing). -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

Is somebody else able/willing to pick up regular VC 7.1/8.0 regression testing?
Hi. I could be able to help out a bit. What would I need to do? -- ------------------------------------------- Dan Day http://razzerblog.blogspot.com

Raz <coolmandan@gmail.com> writes:
Please see my reply to Goncalo -- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/127988. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

On 7/14/05, Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> wrote:
Ok. I understand how to do this, but I just have a few questions. First, let me just lay out my available computers: Intel P3 1GHz (mobile chip so it really runs at 700 MHz) 256Mb Ram Windows XP SP 2 VC++ 7.1, 7, and 8 if needed Intel P4 HT GHz 512 Mb Ram Windows XP SP 2 VC++ 7.1 Anyway, here are my questions: Which computer would be best to run these tests on? Would both be better? How much space do these tests usually take? How long do these tests typically run for one toolset? Is there a way to install VC++ 8 remotely[*]? I'm sorry if I am just being naive, but I just want to make sure I'm doing this right. [*] I'm on vacation right now. It would be nice to be able to use VC++ 8 on my faster computer, but I haven't put the latest beta on there yet. Hence the reason I asked.
-- ------------------------------------------- Dan Day http://razzerblog.blogspot.com

Raz writes:
I'd say whichever is less used by you :). Basically, the shorter turnaround time for a particular toolset's results is, the better. Normally, people run the tests nightly because during the day their machines are doing something else, but if you can afford to do it more often, it definitely would be appreciated. If the machines are equally busy, just pick the one that is generally faster.
How much space do these tests usually take?
I'd say at most 10 Gb per toolset.
How long do these tests typically run for one toolset?
Somewhere between 2 to 4 hours per toolset.
Is there a way to install VC++ 8 remotely[*]?
Don't know the answer to this, but it sounds like we will have this particular one covered one way or another, so you might just postpone setting it up until it's relatively painless for you :). -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

On Jul 14, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Doug Gregor wrote:
2) Serialization library: many regressions
I've just run the gcc-3.4.4-linux tests for this library by hand and everything passes, so something is wrong in the nightly regressions. I'm rerunning the gcc-3.3.6-linux tests now... Doug
participants (9)
-
Aleksey Gurtovoy
-
Andreas Huber
-
David Abrahams
-
Doug Gregor
-
Felipe Magno de Almeida
-
Goncalo N M de Carvalho
-
Martin Slater
-
Raz
-
Victor A. Wagner Jr.