
Disjoint Sets is in the last few releases, has it's own test suite and github archive, but isn't mentioned on the documentation page? An oversight, or intentional? https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_69_0/ I see a defect that says it should move into Graph, is that part of the puzzle? https://github.com/boostorg/disjoint_sets/issues Brian

This repository is one of the CMT maintained repositories. It is header-only and the only consumer inside boost is graph, so the intention is to move it into graph at some point. Maintaining a repository for one header is a bit overkill, and the maintainer of algorithm said it isn't a good fit there. That's the background on it. It's also one of two CMT repositories that haven't gotten a full CI overhaul. Thanks, Jim On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:25 AM Brian Kuhl via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Disjoint Sets is in the last few releases, has it's own test suite and github archive, but isn't mentioned on the documentation page? An oversight, or intentional?
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_69_0/
I see a defect that says it should move into Graph, is that part of the puzzle? https://github.com/boostorg/disjoint_sets/issues
Brian
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (2)
-
Brian Kuhl
-
James E. King III