Does anyone know what happens to all we write at home?

Does anyone know what happens to all we write at home? We habitually put the 'boost' license on such work. However, can your employer claim that *anything* you do belongs to "him" and to slap you with a violation of Confidentiality Agreement or Intellectual Property Agreement? V.

2009/12/6 Vladimir Batov <vbatov@people.net.au>:
Does anyone know what happens to all we write at home? We habitually put the 'boost' license on such work. However, can your employer claim that *anything* you do belongs to "him" and to slap you with a violation of Confidentiality Agreement or Intellectual Property Agreement?
If done completely on your own time without using any of your employer's equipment (like a work laptop, or in a work building), then you might own the copyright. It depends on your employment contract. Often they'll claim anything you do related to any business the *company* is in, in which case you're screwed if you work for something like Microsoft that does everything. More reasonable contracts only claim things directly related to the work you are, have recently been, or will soon be doing for them, with anything beyond that covered by the usual clauses about not helping competitors. IANAL, of course.

On Dec 6, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Vladimir Batov wrote:
Does anyone know what happens to all we write at home? We habitually put the 'boost' license on such work. However, can your employer claim that *anything* you do belongs to "him" and to slap you with a violation of Confidentiality Agreement or Intellectual Property Agreement?
It depends on those contracts. I have been in situations where at least the contracts have stated that anything I did during employment - even after hours *and* on my own computers - related to IT have belonged to my employer. It is arguable whether such wide contracts are legit, though. But, what you do on your employer's computers (such as a laptop you use both at work and at home) is *often* property of the employer. This does (obviously) not constitute a legal advice in one direction or the other; just read your contracts carefully :-) /David
participants (3)
-
David Bergman
-
Scott McMurray
-
Vladimir Batov