Immutable data structure survey results

Hey everyone, Here are the results of the survey that I ran for the name of a potential immutable byte sequence data structure; each line contains the name that was entered and the number of times that it appeared: chain: 9 boost::text: 3 sequence: 2 string: 2 atomic_buffer: 1 blob: 1 buffer: 1 bytes: 1 chord (from the Latin chorda meaning string): 1 const_buf: 1 const_string: 1 data_block: 1 fixed_sequence<char>: 1 frame: 1 immutable::string: 1 immutable_sequence: 1 imstring: 1 rod: 1 rope: 1 sequence<char>: 1 strand: 1 tier: 1 whole_buffer: 1 wire: 1 yarn: 1 TOTAL: 37 To be transparent, I have also attached the script that I used to generate the above, which includes the raw results pasted inside a multi-line string. (Yes Artyom I included your vote in the tally.) I apologize for any problems you might have had with this service. I considered using another free service online which would be better suited for this purpose, but I wasn't sure of how many responses there would be and most services put a cap on 100 responses for their free services, whereas the service I have access to through my university has no such restriction. Since the actual number of responses was less than half of 100 I will know for future reference that one of the other free services should work just fine for this purpose. Thanks to everyone who responded! Cheers, Greg

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Gregory Crosswhite <gcross@phys.washington.edu> wrote:
Looks like chain it is then. :) Thanks to Matus for the brilliant and insightful suggestion! :D Now Matus, if you can come up with a different name that's "better" than Boost.Network then that would be one away from a hat trick! :)
I apologize for any problems you might have had with this service.
No need to apologize sir, it was a brilliant service anyway. :)
Thanks to everyone who responded!
Thank you for setting it up! Definitely appreciated sir. :) -- Dean Michael Berris about.me/deanberris

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote:
You are quite welcome. I'm glad that I was able to contribute with at least something insightful to this discussion ;-)
Now Matus, if you can come up with a different name that's "better" than Boost.Network then that would be one away from a hat trick! :)
I've had an insomniac weekend so let me have some sleep before I do any attempts on that one :-P Matus
participants (3)
-
Dean Michael Berris
-
Gregory Crosswhite
-
Matus Chochlik