Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest
----- Mensaje original ----- De: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> Fecha: Viernes, Enero 20, 2006 5:45 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest
Bruno Martínez <br1@internet.com.uy> writes:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:52:22 -0200, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin@tid.es> wrote:
OK, you have shown a realistic scenario where the feature is valuable, so I'm putting this into my todo list --probably I can have it in time for 1.34, but I'm very slow writing and checking>> things :) Any suggestions about the name/syntax? Something like:
iterator iter_to(const value_type& x)const;
iterator_from()?
I don't know. I'm spanish speaking too.
position(const value_type& x) const;
position() would be a perfect fit except for one thing: in the roadmapped ranked indices (http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/future_work.html#ranked_indices) I will need another member function to return the position ordinal of a given element (that is, the inverse of operator[]), and for that "position" seems also a good candidate. If we could find some other name for this latter memfunction, I think I'd adopt "position" for the former.
or if you are worried about "position" sounding like a verb,
get_position(const value_type& x) const;
"position" seems OK to me as the verb interpretation doesn't look so obvious, but then again I'm not a native English speaker --incidentally, those who proposed empty() for STL containers didn't seem to have their English well oiled that day, either :) Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
----- Mensaje original ----- De: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> Fecha: Viernes, Enero 20, 2006 5:45 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest
Bruno Martínez <br1@internet.com.uy> writes:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:52:22 -0200, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin@tid.es> wrote:
OK, you have shown a realistic scenario where the feature is valuable, so I'm putting this into my todo list --probably I can have it in time for 1.34, but I'm very slow writing and checking>> things :) Any suggestions about the name/syntax? Something like:
iterator iter_to(const value_type& x)const;
iterator_from()?
I don't know. I'm spanish speaking too.
position(const value_type& x) const;
position() would be a perfect fit except for one thing: in the roadmapped ranked indices
(http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/future_work.html#ranked_indices)
I will need another member function to return the position ordinal of a given element (that is, the inverse of operator[]), and for that "position" seems also a good candidate.
IMO that should have been "index."
If we could find some other name for this latter memfunction, I think I'd adopt "position" for the former.
or if you are worried about "position" sounding like a verb,
get_position(const value_type& x) const;
"position" seems OK to me as the verb interpretation doesn't look so obvious,
"Position yourself between me and the wall" It's not a very common usage, so I agree with you.
but then again I'm not a native English speaker --incidentally, those who proposed empty() for STL containers didn't seem to have their English well oiled that day, either :)
:) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
participants (2)
-
David Abrahams -
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z