*BSD detail/endian.hpp header patch looking for review
Hi, There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able to help out here? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a écrit :
Hi,
There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able to help out here?
Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch? Vicente
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit :
Hi,
There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able to help out here?
Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch?
This was already answered in the ticket. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit :
Hi,
There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able to help out here?
Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch?
This was already answered in the ticket.
I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket. Best, Vicente
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a ?crit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit :
Hi,
There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able to help out here?
Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch? This was already answered in the ticket.
I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket.
"The same code that uses this header in the first place." -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:39:36AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a ?crit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit :
Hi,
There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able to help out here?
Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch? This was already answered in the ticket.
I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket.
"The same code that uses this header in the first place."
Would you please stop channeling Theo and instead just answer with clarifications? While this might be acceptable behaviour in whatever organization you work in, it's not acceptable here. Be nice and helpful. Annoying contributors won't help getting them to go out of their way to aid in getting patches integrated. -- Lars Viklund | zao@acc.umu.se
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:54:29PM +0100, Lars Viklund wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:39:36AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a ?crit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit :
Hi,
There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able to help out here?
Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch? This was already answered in the ticket.
I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket.
"The same code that uses this header in the first place."
Would you please stop channeling Theo and instead just answer with clarifications? While this might be acceptable behaviour in whatever organization you work in, it's not acceptable here. Be nice and helpful.
Annoying contributors won't help getting them to go out of their way to aid in getting patches integrated.
$ find . -exec grep "boost/detail/endian.hpp" {} \; -print #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/archive/impl/basic_binary_iarchive.ipp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/detail/limits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/math/special_functions/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/mpl/string.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/endian/endian.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/math/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./libs/math/example/inspect_fp.cpp -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Le 17/02/13 18:16, Brad Smith a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:54:29PM +0100, Lars Viklund wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:39:36AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a ?crit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit : > Hi, > > There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's > in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able > to help out here? > Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch? This was already answered in the ticket.
I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket. "The same code that uses this header in the first place." Would you please stop channeling Theo and instead just answer with clarifications? While this might be acceptable behaviour in whatever organization you work in, it's not acceptable here. Be nice and helpful.
Annoying contributors won't help getting them to go out of their way to aid in getting patches integrated. $ find . -exec grep "boost/detail/endian.hpp" {} \; -print #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/archive/impl/basic_binary_iarchive.ipp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/detail/limits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/math/special_functions/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/mpl/string.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/endian/endian.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/math/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./libs/math/example/inspect_fp.cpp
The question intention was to assign it to the library you are using so that the ticket is taken by the author using this internal library. I you left it associated to the None component, None will take care of it. HTH, Vicente
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:36:21PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 18:16, Brad Smith a ?crit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:54:29PM +0100, Lars Viklund wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:39:36AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a ?crit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote: >Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit : >>Hi, >> >>There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's >>in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able >>to help out here? >> >Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch? This was already answered in the ticket.
I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket. "The same code that uses this header in the first place." Would you please stop channeling Theo and instead just answer with clarifications? While this might be acceptable behaviour in whatever organization you work in, it's not acceptable here. Be nice and helpful.
Annoying contributors won't help getting them to go out of their way to aid in getting patches integrated. $ find . -exec grep "boost/detail/endian.hpp" {} \; -print #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/archive/impl/basic_binary_iarchive.ipp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/detail/limits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/math/special_functions/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/mpl/string.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/endian/endian.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/math/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./libs/math/example/inspect_fp.cpp
The question intention was to assign it to the library you are using so that the ticket is taken by the author using this internal library. I you left it associated to the None component, None will take care of it.
I would have assigned the field as appropriate if I knew what to set it to. I don't know so I can't answer that question now that I know what it was you were trying to ask. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:47:41PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:36:21PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 18:16, Brad Smith a ?crit :
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:54:29PM +0100, Lars Viklund wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:39:36AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a ?crit : >On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote: >>Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit : >>>Hi, >>> >>>There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's >>>in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able >>>to help out here? >>> >>Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch? >This was already answered in the ticket. > I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket. "The same code that uses this header in the first place." Would you please stop channeling Theo and instead just answer with clarifications? While this might be acceptable behaviour in whatever organization you work in, it's not acceptable here. Be nice and helpful.
Annoying contributors won't help getting them to go out of their way to aid in getting patches integrated. $ find . -exec grep "boost/detail/endian.hpp" {} \; -print #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/archive/impl/basic_binary_iarchive.ipp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/detail/limits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/math/special_functions/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/mpl/string.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/endian/endian.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/math/detail/fp_traits.hpp #include <boost/detail/endian.hpp> ./libs/math/example/inspect_fp.cpp
The question intention was to assign it to the library you are using so that the ticket is taken by the author using this internal library. I you left it associated to the None component, None will take care of it.
I would have assigned the field as appropriate if I knew what to set it to. I don't know so I can't answer that question now that I know what it was you were trying to ask.
Since there is not a component listed for the files under boost/detail/ what would be the next best component to use? build? config? I see bug reports listed as None. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
participants (3)
-
Brad Smith -
Lars Viklund -
Vicente J. Botet Escriba