Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time. Thanks, --Beman
Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time.
There are release candidates up at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/ I'd appreciate Boosters downloading on their favorite platform, and giving the packages a try. It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK. Thanks, --Beman
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time.
There are release candidates up at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
I'd appreciate Boosters downloading on their favorite platform, and giving the packages a try.
It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK.
Starting from the .7z package, the libraries built OK with VC++ 9.0. --Beman
On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time.
There are release candidates up at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
I'd appreciate Boosters downloading on their favorite platform, and giving the packages a try.
It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK.
Starting from the .7z package, the libraries built OK with VC++ 9.0.
Starting from the .bz2 package, the libraries built OK with gcc 4.2.1 (darwin) -- Marshall
Marshall Clow wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time.
There are release candidates up at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
I'd appreciate Boosters downloading on their favorite platform, and giving the packages a try.
It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK.
Starting from the .7z package, the libraries built OK with VC++ 9.0.
Starting from the .bz2 package, the libraries built OK with gcc 4.2.1 (darwin)
-- Marshall
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Built libs OK (and some of my own client code) on fedora f13 x86_64 gcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.x86_64
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote:
Built libs OK (and some of my own client code) on fedora f13 x86_64 gcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.x86_64
Built libs ok (and my own client code) with same setup, but I get a lot of strict aliasing warnings caused by optional.hpp . Can these warnings be reduced without using -fno-strict-aliasing ? thanks jose
The 7z package successfully built with VC10 RTM x86 and x64. Stephan T. Lavavej Visual C++ Libraries Developer -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Marshall Clow Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 12:28 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Release imminent On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time.
There are release candidates up at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
I'd appreciate Boosters downloading on their favorite platform, and giving the packages a try.
It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK.
Starting from the .7z package, the libraries built OK with VC++ 9.0.
Starting from the .bz2 package, the libraries built OK with gcc 4.2.1 (darwin) -- Marshall _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
On 08/13/2010 08:19 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time.
There are release candidates up at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
I'd appreciate Boosters downloading on their favorite platform, and giving the packages a try.
It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK.
Builds fine with gcc-4.4.3 on Ubuntu 10.4 (64bit)
On 13 August 2010 19:19, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK.
It looks good to me. Since the documentation is now stored differently on the server, I put it on there myself so you don't need to upload it. We'll have to sort out how it'll be done in the future before the next release. I used the bzipped file since the website is no longer using zipped files, but I don't think that will make a significant difference. Daniel
On 8/13/2010 11:19 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
Unless someone objects right away, I plan to start building the release at 1PM, US Eastern Daylight Time. There are release candidates up at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
I'd appreciate Boosters downloading on their favorite platform, and giving the packages a try.
It is also useful to know if the generated docs look OK.
Thanks,
--Beman _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe& other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
starting with zip package, vc8 builds fine. I don't understand the documentation links. They are not different than before but I don't understand why Spirit doesn't get pulled in. They are quickbook docs just like xpressive and proto which do get pulled in. I may hunt around later to figure it out. Thank you Beman and the others on the release team for your hard work and dedication. michael -- ---------------------------------- Michael Caisse Object Modeling Designs www.objectmodelingdesigns.com
AMDG Michael Caisse wrote:
I don't understand the documentation links. They are not different than before but I don't understand why Spirit doesn't get pulled in. They are quickbook docs just like xpressive and proto which do get pulled in. I may hunt around later to figure it out.
Are you looking at doc/html/index.html? Not all the BoostBook documentation is linked into this. Some libraries build their documentation independently. In Christ, Steven Watanabe
On 8/14/2010 1:11 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Michael Caisse wrote:
I don't understand the documentation links. They are not different than before but I don't understand why Spirit doesn't get pulled in. They are quickbook docs just like xpressive and proto which do get pulled in. I may hunt around later to figure it out.
Are you looking at doc/html/index.html? Not all the BoostBook documentation is linked into this. Some libraries build their documentation independently.
Yes. That makes sense. Thank you Steven. -- ---------------------------------- Michael Caisse Object Modeling Designs www.objectmodelingdesigns.com
participants (9)
-
Beman Dawes -
Daniel James -
Jose -
Marshall Clow -
Michael Caisse -
Neal Becker -
Roland Bock -
Stephan T. Lavavej -
Steven Watanabe