Message: 6 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:46:32 -0500 From: Rene Rivera <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> Subject: To: Message-ID: <411AF628.80605@redshift-software.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Robert Ramey wrote:
Actually I'm not doing the testing. I'm just relying on the table of test results which refers to compiler "CW" So I don't really know what version it is.
It's 9.2, or possibly 9.3. Stefan should really label the version.
Stefan: if you tell me which version you are running I can add a toolset into CVS for it.
Hmmm so the current set of facts is: Ramey:CWPro 9.2 in debug mode - fails export tests Rivera:CWPro 8.3 in release mode - fails export tests Stephan:CWPro 9.2?3 in ? mode - passes export tests. Its not clear to me how to address this. I would love to know what I'm doing differently than Stephan is. We're using the same tool set - cwpro9 or are we? Shouldn't the heading on the results table correspond to the toolset name? I'm using the toolset labeled cwpro9 - is this the correct one to use? Robert Ramey
Robert Ramey wrote:
Stefan: if you tell me which version you are running I can add a toolset into CVS for it.
Hmmm so the current set of facts is:
Ramey:CWPro 9.2 in debug mode - fails export tests Rivera:CWPro 8.3 in release mode - fails export tests Stephan:CWPro 9.2?3 in ? mode - passes export tests.
Its not clear to me how to address this. I would love to know what I'm doing differently than Stephan is. We're using the same tool set - cwpro9 or are we? Shouldn't the heading on the results table correspond to the toolset name?
The heading will show it as soon as Stefan starts using the cw-9.2-tools.jam toolset.
I'm using the toolset labeled cwpro9 - is this the correct one to use?
Try the cw-9.2 one. I haven't been updating the cwpro* set of toolsets for a while. And I'll probably change them soon to just use the all-in-one cw-tools.jam. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
Robert Ramey wrote:
Ramey:CWPro 9.2 in debug mode - fails export tests Rivera:CWPro 8.3 in release mode - fails export tests Stephan:CWPro 9.2?3 in ? mode - passes export tests.
Its not clear to me how to address this. I would love to know what I'm doing differently than Stephan is. We're using the same tool set - cwpro9 or are we? Shouldn't the heading on the results table correspond to the toolset name?
Maybe it helps if you also use the regression.py script and post your results to the ftp site. It would make it a lot easier to compare things.
I'm using the toolset labeled cwpro9 - is this the correct one to use?
I've always been using the toolset cw. From now I'm using the toolset cw-9.2 (performing the first run at this moment). Stefan
participants (3)
-
Rene Rivera -
Robert Ramey -
Stefan Slapeta