--- Peder Holt wrote: Do we have a good name for the project? metamath or mpl_math or something new?
I don't know what the current naming scheme would prescribe for an annex to a preexisting library, but I think Boost.MPL.Math, or MPL.Math for short, would make a fine name for use in discussions. "mpl_math" is just a file name I use when uploading to the vault, as is "metadouble" or "mpl_double" for your corresponding submissions. Cromwell D. Enage ______________________________________________________ Yahoo! for Good Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
On 9/23/05, Cromwell Enage <sponage@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Peder Holt wrote: Do we have a good name for the project? metamath or mpl_math or something new?
I don't know what the current naming scheme would prescribe for an annex to a preexisting library, but I think Boost.MPL.Math, or MPL.Math for short, would make a fine name for use in discussions. "mpl_math" is just a file name I use when uploading to the vault, as is "metadouble" or "mpl_double" for your corresponding submissions.
boost.mpl.math sounds good, We should probably use mpl_math as the sandbox cvs name, then. I'll create an entry using the current version of your library. Regards, Peder
Cromwell D. Enage
______________________________________________________ Yahoo! for Good Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Cromwell Enage writes:
--- Peder Holt wrote: Do we have a good name for the project? metamath or mpl_math or something new?
I don't know what the current naming scheme would prescribe for an annex to a preexisting library, but I think Boost.MPL.Math, or MPL.Math for short, would make a fine name for use in discussions.
Sounds like a perfect fit! -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
participants (3)
-
Aleksey Gurtovoy -
Cromwell Enage -
Peder Holt