Re: [boost] [multi_index][serialization]save_construct_data not called for multi_index collection

________________________________________ De: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] En nombre de Robert Ramey [ramey@rrsd.com] Enviado el: sábado, 09 de enero de 2010 21:42 Para: boost@lists.boost.org Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index][serialization]save_construct_data not called for multi_index collection
Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
Hi Felipe, I still haven't received an answer to my question about Boost.Serialization, so, given the sensible nature of serialization code
lol - thank you for such a charitable characterization.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not referring to Boost.Serialization code, but to the code (in this particular case, inside Boost.MultiIndex) devoted to serializing a particular type: if one makes a wrong/bad decision within it, great care has to be taken so as to fix this decision while being backwards compatible with archives created with prior versions of the lib. In no way were I referring to any particular aspect of Boost.Serialization, being this problem absolutely inherent to any serialization framework one could use. Besides, I much appreciate the work you put in B.S. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ wrote:
________________________________________ De: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] En nombre de Robert Ramey [ramey@rrsd.com] Enviado el: sábado, 09 de enero de 2010 21:42 Para: boost@lists.boost.org Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index][serialization]save_construct_data not called for multi_index collection
Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
Hi Felipe, I still haven't received an answer to my question about Boost.Serialization, so, given the sensible nature of serialization code
lol - thank you for such a charitable characterization.
Don't get me wrong, ...
Damn, I was taking that as a complement. Owing to a most improbable set of circumstances, I spent 14 years in latin america and speak fluent spanish. So I suspect that you meant "sensitive" rather than "sensible". Robert Ramey
participants (2)
-
JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ
-
Robert Ramey