
Are those real? One of them, for example reads: "Support for Borland compilers older than BCB2006 is deprecated in Boost 1.34", which looks like the result of #error directive... Regards, Arkadiy

Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
Are those real? One of them, for example reads: "Support for Borland compilers older than BCB2006 is deprecated in Boost 1.34", which looks like the result of #error directive...
That Borland message is a waring, not an #error, issues using #pragma message. I believe the failures are for real, and think Jeremy may have committed an update to explicit-failures-markup.xml on HEAD, but it has not been committed to RC_1_34_0 branch yet. -- AlisdairM

"Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb@hotmail.com> writes:
Are those real? One of them, for example reads: "Support for Borland compilers older than BCB2006 is deprecated in Boost 1.34", which looks like the result of #error directive...
Those failures are for tests that are required to cause compilation errors in order to pass. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
participants (3)
-
AlisdairM
-
Arkadiy Vertleyb
-
David Abrahams