hi, Boost.Geometry is moved from sandbox to trunk yesterday. Questions: 1) Will I update the two files libraries.htm and maintainers.txt within $/trunk/libs to add geometry there? 2) How will geometry appear in the trunk regression overviews? There are already many unit tests using Boost.Test and jamfiles handling them. Thanks, Barend
On 31 December 2010 13:45, Barend Gehrels <barend@geodan.nl> wrote:
1) Will I update the two files libraries.htm and maintainers.txt within $/trunk/libs to add geometry there?
Please do.
2) How will geometry appear in the trunk regression overviews? There are already many unit tests using Boost.Test and jamfiles handling them.
You need to add it to 'status/Jamfile.v2' which runs all the tests. Later, you might need to add details of any tests you expect to fail to 'status/explicit-failures-markup.xml'. thanks, Daniel
Hi Daniel, Thanks.
1) Will I update the two files libraries.htm and maintainers.txt within $/trunk/libs to add geometry there? Please do.
Done.
2) How will geometry appear in the trunk regression overviews? There are already many unit tests using Boost.Test and jamfiles handling them. You need to add it to 'status/Jamfile.v2' which runs all the tests.
Done. I will look tomorrow what is generated for it.
Later, you might need to add details of any tests you expect to fail to 'status/explicit-failures-markup.xml'.
OK, good to know. Regards, Barend
On 31-12-2010 14:57, Daniel James wrote:
On 31 December 2010 13:45, Barend Gehrels<barend@geodan.nl> wrote:
1) Will I update the two files libraries.htm and maintainers.txt within $/trunk/libs to add geometry there? Please do.
2) How will geometry appear in the trunk regression overviews? There are already many unit tests using Boost.Test and jamfiles handling them. You need to add it to 'status/Jamfile.v2' which runs all the tests. Later, you might need to add details of any tests you expect to fail to 'status/explicit-failures-markup.xml'.
I have updated the explicit-failures-markup.xml and noted several compilers as non usable (pathscale, pgi, vcapp, sun, borland, msvc 7). Questions: - most libraries (but not all) fail for these compilers, but there are only a few having this note. What is the policy here? - some of my tests fail because of a time-limit ( http://tinyurl.com/64mzq4x ), is that configurable? - there is no msvc-8.0 test running? - there is no comeau test running? Regards, Barend
Barend Gehrels wrote:
I have updated the explicit-failures-markup.xml and noted several compilers as non usable (pathscale, pgi, vcapp, sun, borland, msvc 7).
Questions: - most libraries (but not all) fail for these compilers, but there are only a few having this note. What is the policy here?
For the moment I have set N/A pathscale and borland for Boost.Chrono, but I think I would add vcapp also. I have reported a possible solution for PGI but no one has tried to make a trial. Vladimir?
- some of my tests fail because of a time-limit ( http://tinyurl.com/64mzq4x ), is that configurable?
It is configurable. But, couldn't you reduce the time of your tests, or make each test make less things?
- there is no msvc-8.0 test running?
See Tester VC8 jc-bell.com. The last run was form Jan, 12. Jim could you make a new run on this platform? BTW, you can post this kind of message to the boost-testing ML. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/geometry-moved-to-trunk-tp3169401p3229373... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Barend! I look forward to using Boost.Geometry in some of my app ideas soon! :) Sent from my Mobile Device On Dec 31, 2010 9:46 PM, "Barend Gehrels" <barend@geodan.nl> wrote: hi, Boost.Geometry is moved from sandbox to trunk yesterday. Questions: 1) Will I update the two files libraries.htm and maintainers.txt within $/trunk/libs to add geometry there? 2) How will geometry appear in the trunk regression overviews? There are already many unit tests using Boost.Test and jamfiles handling them. Thanks, Barend _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Hi, 31-12-2010 16:07, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
I look forward to using Boost.Geometry in some of my app ideas soon! :)
Good to hear ;-) 31-12-2010 14:57, Daniel James wrote:
You need to add it to 'status/Jamfile.v2' which runs all the tests.
The tests are indeed running now, and give new information, I'll process it soon. Regards, Barend
participants (4)
-
Barend Gehrels -
Daniel James -
Dean Michael Berris -
Vicente Botet