On 01.07.2017 18:42, Christian Henning via Boost wrote:

Hi Andrey,

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote:

...

Looks like a compiler bug to me. You can try replacing `get_property_f::operator()` with a regular named function. Same with `set_property`.

Thanks Andrey. Stefan Seefeld had the same inclination. I'll try to rename operator() and see if that fixes the issue.

Note that the problem isn't the (name of the) operator(). It's the fact that it is a function / operator template, within a class template, which requires the "template" keyword to disambiguate the syntax (gotta love C++...). I believe the suggestion is to fuse the two into one (i.e. make a single function template with two template parameters, rather than a function template within a class template, or something like that... An entirely different approach would be to simply punt and skip that particular set of tiff tests with the buggy compiler. (That would require the tests to be separated into separate executables, though, so the others would be able to compile and run.) Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...