Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Joel de Guzman Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:41 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state
Jost, Andrew wrote:
Hmmm. This reminds me of using the STL algorithms before having Boost.Lambda, Boost.Bind, etc. Without a library of predefined function objects that perform useful, reusable adaptations, or a lambda approach to creating the adapters, one winds up
value extraction logic from the context in which it is used.
The Boost.Optional::adapter syntax is its own predefined
separating the library and,
though lambda is a fantastic approach, it won't compile using Microsoft so we can't say it's the new paradigm.
lambda works on Microsoft VC7.1 and above. Did I miss the context of your statement?
Sorry, you are right. I am using VC 6.0 :-(
Cheers, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Don't quote more than your recipient need. Don't break threads if you can. Jost, Andrew wrote:
though lambda is a fantastic approach, it won't compile using Microsoft so we can't say it's the new paradigm.
lambda works on Microsoft VC7.1 and above. Did I miss the context of your statement?
Sorry, you are right. I am using VC 6.0 :-(
participants (2)
-
Andrey Melnikov -
Jost, Andrew