Hi, There are a lot of Boost libraries already included in the C++ Standards Committee's Library Technical Report (TR1). More Boost libraries are proposed for the upcoming TR2. As all these libraries do not conform completly to the standard for different raisons: the compliler do not support some feautres of the C++0x, the emulation seems to complex or any other justification. I think that it will help the users to have a clear statement, library by library, of which features the library conform to or not. This statement should contain the library feature(class, typedef, constants, functions, ...), dependencies on other C++0x features, whether it conforms on C++0x compilers supporting the needed compiler features, if it use some workaround on other compilers and finaly for the non conformant features why the library do not conforms. It will be also useful to state which features on the library are not on the standard. I have prepared as an example a table for the Boost.Thread library (limited tothread and this thread API). Anthony the informations on these tables could be wrong. Attached boost_thread_conformance.qbk and boost_thread_conformance.html Any comments and ideas are welcome. HTH, Vicente