I think Aleksey forgot to mention: my CW column is for CW 9. I didn't have the time yet to investigate much but the results are quite common with the CW 8 results. However, the first dynamic_bitset test produces an ICE on CW9! Also the results for program_options seem to be interesting. Stefan
Stefan Slapeta wrote:
I think Aleksey forgot to mention: my CW column is for CW 9.
I didn't have the time yet to investigate much but the results are quite common with the CW 8 results.
However, the first dynamic_bitset test produces an ICE on CW9!
Also the results for program_options seem to be interesting.
Hmm... indeed. I see failures for cmdline_test causes by the fact that there's std::detail namespace. Seems like a problem in standard library -- it should be using std::__detail, IMO, or something equally ugly. Anyway, I've fixed this just now. Two other failures are link errors for parse_config_file in DLL version. That function template is declared in header, but only defined/instantinated in source file. Could you try going to boost/program_options/parsers.hpp and changing the definition of the function to: template<class charT> BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DECL basic_parsed_options<charT> parse_config_file(std::basic_istream<charT>&, const options_description&); I.e. adding BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DECL. Maybe this could help.... Thanks, Volodya
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:03:20 +0200, Stefan Slapeta <stefan_nospam_@slapeta.com> wrote:
I think Aleksey forgot to mention: my CW column is for CW 9.
I didn't have the time yet to investigate much but the results are quite common with the CW 8 results.
However, the first dynamic_bitset test produces an ICE on CW9!
With the minuscule spare time I have now it's impossible for me to even notice these things :( Wouldn't it be possible to have the test results ordered *by library* somewhere? That would at least avoid following the link for each platform. -- Genny. -- Genny.
Gennaro Prota wrote:
With the minuscule spare time I have now it's impossible for me to even notice these things :( Wouldn't it be possible to have the test results ordered *by library* somewhere? That would at least avoid following the link for each platform.
Have you looked at the Metacomm result pages?? For example here's the dynamic_bitset result referred to in the previous messages: http://tinyurl.com/6qnpw http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/dynamic_bits... Boost regression: dynamic_bitset/CVS-HEAD -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 08:54:30 -0500, Rene Rivera <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> wrote:
Gennaro Prota wrote:
With the minuscule spare time I have now it's impossible for me to even notice these things :( Wouldn't it be possible to have the test results ordered *by library* somewhere? That would at least avoid following the link for each platform.
Have you looked at the Metacomm result pages?? For example here's the dynamic_bitset result referred to in the previous messages:
http://tinyurl.com/6qnpw http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/dynamic_bits... Boost regression: dynamic_bitset/CVS-HEAD
Yes, but unless I'm missing something those are for Win32 only. I think it would be very helpful for library developers to have a page listing the results of a given library on all compilers/platforms. Example: dynamic_bitset -------------- Win32 <table of Win32 results> Linux <table of Linux results> HP-UX <...> ... Otherwise it becomes a pain to notice a regression somewhere. You have to look everywhere, each time... -- Genny.
Gennaro Prota wrote:
Yes, but unless I'm missing something those are for Win32 only.
Yes, we are missing the future. Those new results are meant to have all platforms. But all the testers need to switch to posting results to metacomm for that to happen. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
participants (4)
-
Gennaro Prota -
Rene Rivera -
Stefan Slapeta -
Vladimir Prus