----Original Message---- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennaro Prota Sent: 18 July 2006 13:47 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification (2006-07-16/RC_1_34_0)

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:39:42 +0100, Anthony Williams <anthony_w.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:

...

...

boostinspect:notbooststandardlicense ?

Looks good to me, though it might look better with underscores, as per the usual boost naming:

boostinspect:not_boost_standard_license

I don't care that much (my only preference is for the tag to appear at the bottom of the file), but the 's' in "BSL" stands for "software", not "standard". Just let me know what your choice is, so that I can make the tool aware of it :)

- I agree it should not say "nolicense" that is too confusing for the naive user. - It probably shouldn't say "not_boost_license" because the license must meet the boost license requirements (http://www.boost.org/more/lib_guide.htm#License). - boostinspect:not_boost_software_license is probably best. Why do you think the tag should be at the end. Surely next to the actual license would be best? -- Martin Bonner Martin.Bonner@Pitechnology.com Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ, ENGLAND Tel: +44 (0)1223 203894