On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 12:39 PM Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:

I don't remember whether this library has been endorsed already, but in case it hasn't been, I endorse it.

A brief history, in October I posted an early version of the library to the list where it received endorsements and we had some discussion. Based on the discussion and some internal feedback I went back to redesign some aspects of the library. In particular the way it handles encoded versus non encoded paths and queries, and the way it deals with transformations of the URL which could potentially leave the user with an invalid result (for example, removing the scheme from a relative-path that has a colon in the first segment. Where we are at now is that the library needs a review manager and a date on the review schedule, and the library is ready for the usual critiques that appear for libraries with heavy demand :) So if folks want to "kick the tires and light the fires" (i.e. install the library locally in their Boost tree and experiment with it) then it is definitely the time for that. Thanks

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 17:33, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:52 PM Vinnie Falco wrote:

...

...

So, what's the process for getting a review manager?

The hardest part still, I think: a volunteer hunt: https://www.boost.org/development/submissions.html#Seeking Then, we will agree upon the review dates. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net