Boost regression notification (2006-10-04 [RC_1_34_0])

Boost Regression test failures Report time: 2006-10-04T11:15:28Z This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms. Detailed report: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... 434 failures in 15 libraries filesystem (5) graph (1) io (1) iostreams (14) mpl (4) parameter (11) program_options (9) python (214) rational (5) serialization (16) spirit (5) test (2) tr1 (56) utility (1) xpressive (90) |filesystem| convenience_test: msvc-8.0 fstream_test: msvc-8.0 mbcopy: sun-5.8 path_test: msvc-8.0 wide_test: sun-5.8 |graph| graphviz_test: msvc-8.0 |io| ios_state_unit_test: gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 |iostreams| bzip2_test: msvc-7.1 msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 msvc-8.0 example_test: vc-6_5-stlport finite_state_filter_test: cw-9.4 gzip_test: msvc-7.1 msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 msvc-8.0 zlib_test: msvc-7.1 msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 msvc-8.0 |mpl| multiset: gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc gcc-4_0_3_tru64 vector_c: sun-5.8 |parameter| optional_deduced_sfinae: sun-5.8 preprocessor_deduced: sun-5.8 python_test: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 qcc-3.3.5_gpp sun-5.8 sfinae: borland-5_8_2 vc-6_5-stlport |program_options| cmdline_test_dll: cw-9.4 options_description_test_dll: cw-9.4 parsers_test_dll: cw-9.4 positional_options_test_dll: cw-9.4 unicode_test_dll: borland-5_8_2 cw-9.4 variable_map_test_dll: borland-5_8_2 cw-9.4 winmain_dll: cw-9.4 |python| andreas_beyer: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 args: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc auto_ptr: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc back_reference: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc bases: gcc-3_4_4_tru64 hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 ben_scott1: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 bienstman1: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc bienstman2: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc bienstman3: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc builtin_converters: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc callbacks: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc const_argument: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 crossmod_exception: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 crossmod_opaque: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc data_members: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc defaults: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc dict: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc docstring: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 enum: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc exception_translator: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc exec: gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4_0_3_tru64 hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 extract: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc implicit: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc vc-6_5 vc-6_5-stlport vc-7_0 injected: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc iterator: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc keywords: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 list: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc long: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc map_indexing_suite: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc minimal: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc multi_arg_constructor: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc nested: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 numpy: darwin-4.0.1 gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc object: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc opaque: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc operators: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 pearu1: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc pickle1: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc pickle2: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc pickle3: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc pickle4: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc pointee: gcc-3_4_4_tru64 hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 pointer_type_id_test: gcc-3_4_4_tru64 hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 pointer_vector: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc polymorphism: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc polymorphism2: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc gcc-4_0_3_tru64 polymorphism2_auto_ptr: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc gcc-4_0_3_tru64 properties: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 raw_ctor: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc return_arg: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc shared_ptr: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc slice: darwin-4.0.1 gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-3_4_4_tru64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 staticmethod: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc stl_iterator: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc str: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test_pointer_adoption: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc try: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc tuple: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc upcast: gcc-3_4_4_tru64 hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 vector_indexing_suite: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc virtual_functions: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc voidptr: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc wrapper_held_type: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc gcc-4_0_3_tru64 |rational| rational_test: borland-5_6_4 sun-5.8 vc-6_5 vc-6_5-stlport vc-7_0 |serialization| test_class_info_load_text_warchive: vc-6_5 test_non_default_ctor2_text_archive: qcc-3.3.5_cpp test_non_default_ctor2_text_archive_dll: qcc-3.3.5_cpp test_non_default_ctor2_text_warchive: qcc-3.3.5_cpp test_non_default_ctor2_text_warchive_dll: qcc-3.3.5_cpp test_reset_object_address: vc-7_0 test_reset_object_address_dll: vc-7_0 test_simple_class_binary_archive_dll: vc-6_5 test_simple_class_text_archive_dll: vc-6_5 test_simple_class_text_warchive_dll: vc-6_5 test_simple_class_xml_archive_dll: vc-6_5 test_simple_class_xml_warchive_dll: vc-6_5 test_variant_xml_archive: borland-5_8_2 test_variant_xml_archive_dll: borland-5_8_2 test_variant_xml_warchive: borland-5_8_2 test_variant_xml_warchive_dll: borland-5_8_2 |spirit| action_tests: qcc-3.3.5_cpp qcc-3.3.5_gpp action_tests_debug: qcc-3.3.5_cpp qcc-3.3.5_gpp mix_and_match_trees: sun-5.8 |test| parameterized_test_test: vc-6_5 vc-6_5-stlport |tr1| std_run_complex_overloads: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_run_random: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_bind: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_function: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_hash: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_hash_header: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_mem_fn: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_random: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_reference_wrapper: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_regex: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_result_of: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_shared_array_header: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_shared_ptr_header: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_tr1_include: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_tuple: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 std_test_tuple_tricky: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_bind: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_function: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_functional_std_header: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_hash: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_mem_fn: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_random: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_reference_wrapper: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_result_of: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_tr1_include: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_tuple: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_tuple_tricky: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 test_utility_std_header: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 |utility| operators_test: gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64 |xpressive| c_traits: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc misc1: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc regress: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test1: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test10: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test10u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test11: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test11u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test1u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test2: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test2u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test3: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test3u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test4: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test4u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test5: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test5u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test6: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test6u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test7: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test7u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test8: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test8u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test9: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test9u: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test_cycles: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test_dynamic: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test_match_results: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test_non_char: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc test_static: gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.4 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc

"Douglas Gregor" <dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> wrote in message news:200610041601.k94G1Vlb023151@milliways.osl.iu.edu...
Boost Regression test failures Report time: 2006-10-04T11:15:28Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is...
434 failures in 15 libraries filesystem (5) graph (1) io (1) iostreams (14) mpl (4) parameter (11) program_options (9) python (214) rational (5) serialization (16) spirit (5) test (2) tr1 (56) utility (1) xpressive (90)
Well, it's pretty much a given that python, tr1, and xpressive are holding back 1.34. So, what is the prognosis on each of these? Is this build ever going to happen, or are we headed for 2007? Michael Goldshteyn

"Michael Goldshteyn" <mgoldshteyn@comcast.net> wrote
434 failures in 15 libraries filesystem (5) graph (1) io (1) iostreams (14) mpl (4) parameter (11) program_options (9) python (214) rational (5) serialization (16) spirit (5) test (2) tr1 (56) utility (1) xpressive (90)
Well, it's pretty much a given that python, tr1, and xpressive are holding back 1.34. So, what is the prognosis on each of these? Is this build ever going to happen, or are we headed for 2007?
Well, if you take a look at the *latest* regression results, it's much better. In fact, I think xpressive should be failure-free once the last of tuesday tests is re-run, and python has only a few failures. How does this work? Are we going to wait for zero failures? Often fixing two failures may be more difficult than fixing 400... Regards, Arkadiy

On Oct 5, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
"Michael Goldshteyn" <mgoldshteyn@comcast.net> wrote
434 failures in 15 libraries filesystem (5) graph (1) io (1) iostreams (14) mpl (4) parameter (11) program_options (9) python (214) rational (5) serialization (16) spirit (5) test (2) tr1 (56) utility (1) xpressive (90)
Well, it's pretty much a given that python, tr1, and xpressive are holding back 1.34. So, what is the prognosis on each of these? Is this build ever going to happen, or are we headed for 2007?
Well, if you take a look at the *latest* regression results, it's much better. In fact, I think xpressive should be failure-free once the last of tuesday tests is re-run, and python has only a few failures.
How does this work? Are we going to wait for zero failures? Often fixing two failures may be more difficult than fixing 400...
Usually we wait until we hit zero failures. That doesn't mean that everything works on every compiler; often, it means that we've explicitly marked up some failures as "expected," because they are too hard to fix on a given compiler. Some of the sun-5.8 ICEs would fall into that category, I expect. Cheers, Doug

Michael Goldshteyn wrote:
Well, it's pretty much a given that python, tr1, and xpressive are holding back 1.34. So, what is the prognosis on each of these? Is this build ever going to happen, or are we headed for 2007?
TR1 was all green, but I managed to break it :-( Next time the results are re-run it should be all green again (they all pass for me here anyway). But you're right, we need to get this out!! John.

Michael Goldshteyn wrote:
Well, it's pretty much a given that python, tr1, and xpressive are holding back 1.34. So, what is the prognosis on each of these? Is this build ever going to happen, or are we headed for 2007?
xpressive has been at 0 failures for months. The spike was my fault -- a bad merge -- and was fixed less than 24 hrs later. Now, we're just waiting for the testers to catch up. Sorry for the hiccup, I really have been a good citizen here. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
participants (6)
-
Arkadiy Vertleyb
-
Doug Gregor
-
Douglas Gregor
-
Eric Niebler
-
John Maddock
-
Michael Goldshteyn