Jason Hise wrote:

In my code, I use the term allocator for policies that mirror the Loki singleton creator policies. For example, my dynamic_allocator class maps almost directly to Alexandrescu's CreateUsingNew policy. It has been suggested that allocator is a misleading term, because users will think that such classes were meant to work with the allocator policy used in the standard containers. Is the term allocator really that misleading? Should I make the massive change in my code to refer to these classes as creators?

I doesn't make that much difference, because whatever you decide, it will be discussed again ad nauseam during review ;-) However, I think using 'allocator' is a bit misleading. Also, it shouldn't be hard to make the substitution in your code. Jonathan