Re: [boost] [utility] new auto_buffer class --- RFC

2 Mar
2009
2 Mar
'09
6:50 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Hulme <st@istic.org> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:21:58PM -0300, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
is rarely what the user wants. I wanted auto_buffer to be a SBO class with a STL interface.
Neither Google nor Wikipedia know what you mean by "SBO". (I'm guessing it's not Small Bowel Obstruction.) Could you clarify this term in your next post to the list, please?
Sorry, It means Small Buffer Optimization. Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida
5944
Age (days ago)
5944
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Felipe Magno de Almeida