Borland const/partial specialization weirdness?
I'm rather confused over the tuple_test_bench failure in Borland 5.6.4: http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-win32_metacomm/developer/output/bin-... Borland supports partial specialization, but I seem to remember some weirdness with its handling of cv-qualifiers in partial specializations. Does anyone know if this is the case, or how the weirdness goes? Doug
"Doug Gregor" <dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> skrev i meddelandet news:200407161551.10359.dgregor@cs.indiana.edu...
I'm rather confused over the tuple_test_bench failure in Borland 5.6.4:
http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-win32_metacomm/developer/output/bin-...
Borland supports partial specialization, but I seem to remember some
weirdness
The problems I have seen with Borland did go away when the <const T> specialization was put before the <T> specialization in the source. Is that it? Bo Persson
participants (2)
-
Bo Persson -
Doug Gregor