RE: [boost] Re: Re: future of boost.threads

On Behalf Of Michael Glassford Subject: [boost] Re: Re: future of boost.threads
I remember very long and involved discussions, but don't remember any consensus being reached or any resolution being found to the difficult issues involved. Am I mistaken?
Mike
Are there any plans to support handling of exceptions thrown during joinable thread execution? I recall Usenet discussions with
"Slawomir Lisznianski" <slisznianski@asyncnet.com> wrote in message news:20040205190629.08537154D84@mail.messagingengine.com... proposals
varying from Futures to throwable join():
try { thread.join(); } catch (std::runtime_error& e) { ... }
Any ideas?
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:59:03 -0500, "Michael Glassford" <glassfordm@hotmail.com> said:
"Burc Arpat" <burch@stanford.edu> wrote in message
<snip>
There has been a specific group set up to discuss thread cancellation and exceptions w.r.t. std c++ on gmane. It is not straight forward is the overall impression I took away ;-) It is worth reading. Regards, Matt Hurd _______________________ Susquehanna Pacific P/L hurdm@sig.com +61.2.8226.5029 _______________________

----- Original Message ----- From: "Hurd, Matthew" <hurdm@sig.com> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: future of boost.threads
There has been a specific group set up to discuss thread cancellation and exceptions w.r.t. std c++ on gmane. It is not straight forward is the overall impression I took away ;-) It is worth reading.
Thanks. I have been following the discussions in that group and took away the same impression.
Regards,
Matt Hurd _______________________
Susquehanna Pacific P/L hurdm@sig.com +61.2.8226.5029 _______________________
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (2)
-
Hurd, Matthew
-
Michael Glassford