[1.35] May I merge a low risk, low prio bug fix?
Hi May I still merge a bug fix to the release branch for 1.35, or is it already too late? The change is: Index: libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp =================================================================== --- libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp (revision 42908) +++ libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp (working copy) @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <iomanip> +#include <ios> // for std::fixed #include <string> #include <algorithm> This is obviously low risk but it's also low priority, as the bug is in an example, not the library itself. Thanks, -- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:19:45AM +0100, Andreas Huber wrote:
May I still merge a bug fix to the release branch for 1.35, or is it already too late? The change is:
Index: libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp =================================================================== --- libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp (revision 42908) +++ libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp (working copy) @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <iomanip> +#include <ios> // for std::fixed #include <string> #include <algorithm>
This is obviously low risk but it's also low priority, as the bug is in an example, not the library itself.
There are many more bugs like this even in the library. They are for many libraries just ignored but are (yep, not always) so easy to fix ... See the script I posted short time ago on this list. Jens
Andreas Huber wrote:
Hi
May I still merge a bug fix to the release branch for 1.35, or is it already too late? The change is:
Index: libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp =================================================================== --- libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp (revision 42908) +++ libs/statechart/example/Performance/Performance.cpp (working copy) @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <iomanip> +#include <ios> // for std::fixed #include <string> #include <algorithm>
This is obviously low risk but it's also low priority, as the bug is in an example, not the library itself.
OK to merge, assuming you've already fixed it on the trunk and it isn't causing trouble. --Beman
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes@acm.org> wrote in message news:479942EE.70202@acm.org...
OK to merge, assuming you've already fixed it on the trunk and it isn't causing trouble.
Done. Regards, -- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
participants (3)
-
Andreas Huber -
Beman Dawes -
Jens Seidel