Boost conventions and unnamed namespaces
I have noticed that the Boost inspect program tries [*] to find unnamed namespaces and marks them as violations. [*] It does not find the one in its own sources, ironically. Does it mean that Boost conventions discourage the use of unnamed namespaces? Regards, -- Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com
on Tue Nov 06 2007, Maciej Sobczak <prog-AT-msobczak.com> wrote:
I have noticed that the Boost inspect program tries [*] to find unnamed namespaces and marks them as violations.
[*] It does not find the one in its own sources, ironically.
Does it mean that Boost conventions discourage the use of unnamed namespaces?
In headers, yes: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/104728 -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
On 11/6/07, Maciej Sobczak <prog@msobczak.com> wrote:
I have noticed that the Boost inspect program tries [*] to find unnamed namespaces and marks them as violations.
[*] It does not find the one in its own sources, ironically.
Does it mean that Boost conventions discourage the use of unnamed namespaces?
In headers, yes.
Regards,
-- Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
participants (3)
-
David Abrahams -
Felipe Magno de Almeida -
Maciej Sobczak