On 7/25/2013 4:44 PM, Mostafa wrote:

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:51:03 -0700, Edward Diener wrote:

...

On 7/25/2013 5:10 AM, Mostafa wrote: [snip]

...

Is this a bug?

It looks like a bug to me. In your 1.53 version of tuple/rem.hpp add:

# define BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM_0()

before the line which says:

# define BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM_1(e0) e0

For some reason, possibly an oversight, Paul removed the "# define BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM_0()" from tuple/rem.hpp when variadic macro support was added to the preprocessor.

I'm going to assume this is going to be fixed in svn without me having to file a ticket ...

That's fine. I will update SVN on the trunk if I don't hear anything from Paul otherwise in a few days.

On 7/29/2013 4:31 AM, Paul Mensonides wrote:

On 7/25/2013 4:37 PM, Edward Diener wrote:

...

On 7/25/2013 4:44 PM, Mostafa wrote:

...

...

I'm going to assume this is going to be fixed in svn without me having to file a ticket ...

That's fine. I will update SVN on the trunk if I don't hear anything from Paul otherwise in a few days.

Go ahead and do it, Edward. I can't get to it for a few days.

Done ! We need better PP tests to catch such a situation. I will try to find time to update the tests before the next Boost version.