[multi_index][repost] ANN: Post-review version available

Some days ago I posted the following prompting for feedback on the post-review version of Boost.MultiIndex (fka Boost.IndexedSet). Just in case the post did go unnoticed, here it goes again. If nobody says anything this will go to the CVS next Friday, but I'd rather get some opinions first (and please please some tests on different compilers). Thank you! ************************************* I'm glad to announce that the post-review version of The Boost Multi-index Containers Library or Boos.MultiIndex (formerly known as Boost.IndexedSet) is available at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/multi_index.zip The most noticeable change is the new name for the library, which I hope will please most and bug none. Also, a new powerful feature called composite_key has been added. The complete list of changes after requests from the reviewers can be consulted at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/multi_index_postreview_notes.html I'd be grateful if the people interested could do the following: 1. make sure that all requests have been met. Those that haven't are justified at the post-review notes. 2. try to compile the library with different compilers. I don't think I've broken anything, but one never knows. This version has been tested with MSVC 6.5, GCC 3.3.1 and ICC 7.1 for Windows. Of special interest are MSVC 7.1, ICC 8.0, GCC 4.0 and CW 9.2. If no one raises any objection, in a week's time I'll commit the library to the main CVS, hopefully in time for Boost 1.32. Thanks everybody, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

[...]
I would just like to second the vote that "far pointer" is confusing in the way you have used it (it most definitely brings to mind a segmented memory architecture, and not the chaining that you really mean). The rest of the points listed in the notes look fine to me. Dave --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.668 / Virus Database: 430 - Release Date: 4/24/2004

"David B. Held" ha escrito:
[...]
I would just like to second the vote that "far pointer" is confusing in the way you have used it (it most definitely brings to mind a segmented memory architecture, and not the chaining that you really mean). The rest of the points listed in the notes look fine to me.
Well, it's three against one :) OK, I'll change that. Best, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
participants (2)
-
David B. Held
-
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz