FORMAL Review of "Output Formatter" library - 7 days left

Dear boosters, For the FORMAL Review of "Output Formatter" - there are 7 days left. <side-note> There are quite a few hot topics at boost. So people might forget that there's a review going on ;) I would like to send a notification like this every 3 days. Boosters, please let me know if you find this ok or not. As I know, it hasn't been done before (announcing a format review multiple times) </side-note> Author: Reece Dunn Description: The outfmt library provides means to write and read containers/ arrays/ ranges (pairs of iterators) to/from STL streams. It also provides means to customize formatting as your write to/read from a stream: std::list<int> l; // { 1, 4, 10 } std::cout << formatob(l); // output: [ 1, 4, 10 ] std::cout << formatob(l).format("<",">"); // output: <1, 4, 10> Download: You can get it from the boost sandbox: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost-sandbox/boost-sandbox/libs/outfm... http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost-sandbox/boost-sandbox/boost/outf... As a convenience (only for the period of the review), you can also get it from http://www.torjo.com/code/outfmt.zip (153Kb) Review process: Your comments may be brief or lengthy, but basically the Review Manager needs your evaluation of the library. If you identify problems along the way, please note if they are minor, serious, or showstoppers. When doing the formal review, please answer the following questions: 1. What is your evaluation of the design? 2. What is your evaluation of the implementation? 3. What is your evaluation of the documentation? 4. What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? 5. Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? 6. How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? 7. Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? And most important, 8. Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion. More on the formal review process: http://www.boost.org/more/formal_review_process.htm The Review Manager is: John Torjo john.lists@torjo.com Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal -- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all -- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/

"John Torjo" <john.lists@torjo.com> wrote in message news:4148ADF7.80307@torjo.com...
For the FORMAL Review of "Output Formatter" - there are 7 days left.
I would like to send a notification like this every 3 days.
Boosters, please let me know if you find this ok or not. As I know, it hasn't been done before (announcing a format review multiple times)
I like the announcement on comp.lang.c++.moderated and the seven-days-left announcement (for a two-week review). I think an anouncment of the last day of the review, posted on the second-to-last day, would be a good idea. But every three days seems like it would become annoying. Best Regards, Jonathan

John Torjo <john.lists@torjo.com> writes:
Boosters, please let me know if you find this ok or not.
It's perfectly okay.
As I know, it hasn't been done before (announcing a format review ^ multiple times)
No, but it's very common to send out reminders about formal reviews ;-) ^ -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com

David Abrahams wrote:
John Torjo <john.lists@torjo.com> writes:
Boosters, please let me know if you find this ok or not.
It's perfectly okay.
As I know, it hasn't been done before (announcing a format review
^
he he ;) How's that for a typo? Best, John -- John Torjo -- john@torjo.com Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal -- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all -- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/ -- v1.4.0 - save_dlg - true binding of your data to UI controls! + easily add validation rules (win32gui/examples/smart_dlg)
participants (3)
-
David Abrahams
-
John Torjo
-
Jonathan Turkanis