I can confirm that I received your message twice. ------Original Message------ From: Isidor Zeuner Sender: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org To: boost@lists.boost.org ReplyTo: boost@lists.boost.org Sent: Aug 20, 2009 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] SHARING_VIOLATION due to antivirus

Quoting Lars Hagstrom <lars@update.uu.se>:

...

Yes, of course it is due to bad AV. But for me it would still be handy if boost.interprocess was a little bit more tolerant towards that. If my software crashes it will be perceived as buggy, however much I blame AV...

One thing you can do is to, at startup, detect if nod32.dll is loaded in your process, and throw up a warning dialog to tell the user that the AV software is buggy.

This seems inappropriate since, if anything, the operating system kernel which forces user space programmers into busy waiting for obtaining locks could be considered buggy by design in that regard. However, this bug could even be warned about at compile time, so we could solve this in boost itself. It is probably inappropriate to do so by default, but for administrators of heterogenous systems it might become handy to have a preprocessor flag which can warn if someone is about to deploy software which uses features the operating system was not designed for, so it can be considered to move the application to a more appropriate platform. Best regards, Isidor PS: The moderation software of this list seems to be broken. I sent this message before, received a "...was successfully received by the Boost mailing list" acknowledgement after a while, but over 12 hours later the message is still neither "successfully received", nor have I got any new status information. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry