Re: [boost] [C++-sig] [Python] GSoC and Python 3.0 Support

Niall Douglas wrote:
I would say that any GSoC project should choose *one* of the above rather than try combining them. Better to do one thing well and in stages than many things at once (unless you have loads of spare time!).
I agree. (I wouldn't mind seeing projects for all of the above, but they definitely shouldn't be combined into one.)
Thanks! Seems there's a lot of interesting. So would anyone willing to mentor this?
Sadly, I suspect that finding a mentor will be difficult (perhaps even more difficult than the actual project). Off the top of my head, the following folks come to mind: - Dave Abrahams - Stefan Seefeld - Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve - Roman Yakovenko You might try contacting them off list or on c++-sig (cc'ed on this email).
I'm willing to participate, in particular, if other folks such as David are part of such a team, too. (While I believe I understand enough of both C++ and Python, lots of boost.python is still very obscure, so having David being part would greatly help. May be we could take the opportunity and collectively work on the (internal) boost.python docs, too. David, I notice you already indicated support. Could we team up for this ? (I will be out on vacation for about two weeks during the summer. Other than that I should be available throughout the summer.) Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Sent from my iPhone On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I'm willing to participate, in particular, if other folks such as
David, I notice you already indicated support. Could we team up for this ?
Sure, I'd be glad to

All, I'm getting the following errors trying to build boost_1_36_0 on AMD Solaris 10 with gcc 4.1.2. Can anyone help? Thanks, Marius $ make install ./tools/jam/src/bin.solarisx86/bjam --user-config=user-config.jam --prefix=/home/mlazer/boost_1_36_0 --exec-prefix=/home/mlazer/boost_1_36_0 --libdir=/home/mlazer/boost_1_36_0/lib --includedir=/home/mlazer/boost_1_36_0/include --with-date_time --with-regex --with-thread install warning: Graph library does not contain optional GraphML reader. note: to enable GraphML support, set EXPAT_INCLUDE and EXPAT_LIBPATH to the note: directories containing the Expat headers and libraries, respectively. warning: skipping optional Message Passing Interface (MPI) library. note: to enable MPI support, add "using mpi ;" to user-config.jam. note: to suppress this message, pass "--without-mpi" to bjam. note: otherwise, you can safely ignore this message. Building Boost.Regex with the optional Unicode/ICU support disabled. Please refer to the Boost.Regex documentation for more information (don't panic: this is a strictly optional feature). ...patience... ...found 14349 targets... ...updating 12 targets... gcc.link.dll bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.1.2/release/threading-multi/libboost_d ate_time-gcc41-mt-1_36.so.1.36.0 /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- start-group /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- end-group /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- strip-all usage: ld [-6:abc:d:e:f:h:il:mo:p:rstu:z:B:CD:F:GI:L:M:N:P:Q:R:S:VY:?] file(s) "g++" -o "bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.1.2/release/threading-multi/libboost_ date_time-gcc41-mt-1_36.so.1.36.0" -Wl,-h -Wl,libboost_date_time-gcc41-mt-1_36.so.1.36.0 -shared -Wl,--start-group "bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.1.2/release/threading-multi/greg_mont h.o" "bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.1.2/release/threading-multi/greg_week day.o" "bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.1.2/release/threading-multi/date_gene rators.o" -Wl,-Bstatic -Wl,-Bdynamic -lrt -Wl,--end-group -Wl,--strip-all -pthreads ********************************************************************** This communication and all information (including, but not limited to, market prices/levels and data) contained therein (the "Information") is for informational purposes only, is confidential, may be legally privileged and is the intellectual property of ICAP plc and its affiliates ("ICAP") or third parties. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. The Information is not, and should not be construed as, an offer, bid or solicitation in relation to any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. The Information is not warranted, including, but not limited, as to completeness, timeliness or accuracy and is subject to change without notice. ICAP assumes no liability for use or misuse of the Information. All representations and warranties are expressly disclaimed. The Information does not necessarily reflect the views of ICAP. Access to the Information by anyone else other than the recipient is unauthorized and any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. **********************************************************************

AMDG Marius Lazer wrote:
I'm getting the following errors trying to build boost_1_36_0 on AMD Solaris 10 with gcc 4.1.2.
<snip>
gcc.link.dll bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.1.2/release/threading-multi/libboost_d ate_time-gcc41-mt-1_36.so.1.36.0 /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- start-group /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- end-group /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- strip-all usage: ld [-6:abc:d:e:f:h:il:mo:p:rstu:z:B:CD:F:GI:L:M:N:P:Q:R:S:VY:?] file(s)
Find the line in user-config.jam which says using gcc : ... : ... ; and add <linker-type>sun to it: using gcc : ... : ... : <linker-type>sun ; (This has been fixed since 1.36) In Christ, Steven Watanabe

On 13 Mar 2009 at 12:10, David Abrahams wrote:
On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I'm willing to participate, in particular, if other folks such as
David, I notice you already indicated support. Could we team up for this ?
Sure, I'd be glad to
Would it make sense if Dave acted as second as in "person we fall back upon if the primaries can't figure it out?" Mentoring would cost any of us at least five hours per week, and definitely more than that some weeks and less other weeks. I'm just very lucky that this summer I have that kind of time spare for the first time in years. Cheers, Niall

On Mar 14, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
On 13 Mar 2009 at 12:10, David Abrahams wrote:
On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I'm willing to participate, in particular, if other folks such as
David, I notice you already indicated support. Could we team up for this ?
Sure, I'd be glad to
Would it make sense if Dave acted as second as in "person we fall back upon if the primaries can't figure it out?"
That would make plenty of sense to me. I'd be very happy to have others leading the mentoring effort. But we may have missed the GSoC application deadline by now. I'm not sure whether anyone signed us up. -- David Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com

On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I'm willing to participate, in particular, if other folks such as
David, I notice you already indicated support. Could we team up for this ?
Sure, I'd be glad to
Would it make sense if Dave acted as second as in "person we fall back upon if the primaries can't figure it out?"
That would make plenty of sense to me. I'd be very happy to have others leading the mentoring effort. But we may have missed the GSoC application deadline by now. I'm not sure whether anyone signed us up.
Troy and me did. No response from Google yet, though. Regards Hartmut

David Abrahams wrote:
On Mar 14, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
Would it make sense if Dave acted as second as in "person we fall back upon if the primaries can't figure it out?"
That would make plenty of sense to me. I'd be very happy to have others leading the mentoring effort. But we may have missed the GSoC application deadline by now. I'm not sure whether anyone signed us up.
I believe we are on track. And I agree, too: It might be wise if people like Niall and myself did the official mentoring, while being able to relay questions we can't answer on our own to David. This could become a productive summer for boost.python ! Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
On Mar 14, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
Would it make sense if Dave acted as second as in "person we fall back upon if the primaries can't figure it out?"
That would make plenty of sense to me. I'd be very happy to have others leading the mentoring effort. But we may have missed the GSoC application deadline by now. I'm not sure whether anyone signed us up.
I believe we are on track. And I agree, too: It might be wise if people like Niall and myself did the official mentoring, while being able to relay questions we can't answer on our own to David.
This could become a productive summer for boost.python !
Thanks, Stefan
Hi, I'm very happy to see so much interest in this project. You are all experts on Boost.Python so I'd glad to see anyone of you to mentor this. I'm looking forward for this summer! I'll post more questions and proposals etc. to Python c++-sig mailling list, since that is focused on Boost.Python. Thanks! -- Haoyu Bai
participants (7)
-
David Abrahams
-
Haoyu Bai
-
Hartmut Kaiser
-
Marius Lazer
-
Niall Douglas
-
Stefan Seefeld
-
Steven Watanabe