Latest version and status of lockfree
Hi All, Where can I find the latest version of boost.lockfree ? There's nothing in the sandbox or the vault (it seems). The latest commit on Tim's public git repo was done more than 6 month ago. Now that atomic has been accepted, are there any roadblocks to have boost.lockfree released ? Many thanks, Julien
Where can I find the latest version of boost.lockfree ? There's nothing in the sandbox or the vault (it seems). The latest commit on Tim's public git repo was done more than 6 month ago.
Now that atomic has been accepted, are there any roadblocks to have boost.lockfree released ?
boost.atomic has been accepted, but it hasn't been merged into trunk, yet ... helge, do you have any timeline? tim
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Where can I find the latest version of boost.lockfree ? There's nothing in the sandbox or the vault (it seems). The latest commit on Tim's public git repo was done more than 6 month ago.
Now that atomic has been accepted, are there any roadblocks to have boost.lockfree released ?
boost.atomic has been accepted, but it hasn't been merged into trunk, yet ... helge, do you have any timeline?
I will package it up before the end of march, this should suffice? Best regards Helge
Where can I find the latest version of boost.lockfree ? There's nothing in the sandbox or the vault (it seems). The latest commit on Tim's public git repo was done more than 6 month ago.
Now that atomic has been accepted, are there any roadblocks to have boost.lockfree released ?
boost.atomic has been accepted, but it hasn't been merged into trunk, yet ... helge, do you have any timeline?
I will package it up before the end of march, this should suffice?
great!
repo was done more than 6 month ago.
Now that atomic has been accepted, are there any roadblocks to have boost.lockfree released ?
boost.atomic has been accepted, but it hasn't been merged into trunk, yet ... helge, do you have any timeline?
I will package it up before the end of march, this should suffice?
great!
any updates on boost.atomic? otherwise, i'd consider merging boost.lockfree into trunk, although it would require using g++-4.7 or clang++-3.1 in c++11 mode ... thoughts? tim
2012/5/6 Tim Blechmann:
any updates on boost.atomic?
otherwise, i'd consider merging boost.lockfree into trunk, although it would require using g++-4.7 or clang++-3.1 in c++11 mode ...
thoughts?
In my opinion, boost.atomic did not usability at the moment: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2012/04/74299.php -- Regards, niXman
any updates on boost.atomic?
otherwise, i'd consider merging boost.lockfree into trunk, although it would require using g++-4.7 or clang++-3.1 in c++11 mode ...
thoughts?
In my opinion, boost.atomic did not usability at the moment: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2012/04/74299.php
the version of boost.atomic which i currently use in the boost.lockfree repository fixes this issue
participants (4)
-
Helge Bahmann -
Julien Nitard -
niXman -
Tim Blechmann