[GGL] Some bits missing from Doxygen docs?
Dear All, In the GGL docs at http://geometrylibrary.geodan.nl/formal%5Freview/ , if I go: Modules -> geometries -> ggl::linear_ring -> List of all members I see a page that says "This is the complete list of members for ggl::linear_ring< P, V, ClockWise, A >, including all inherited members.", and is then entirely empty. Is this what other people see? Maybe it is something odd with my browser. Thanks, Phil.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Phil Endecott <spam_from_boost_dev@chezphil.org> wrote:
I see a page that says "This is the complete list of members for ggl::linear_ring< P, V, ClockWise, A >, including all inherited members.", and is then entirely empty.
Is this what other people see? Maybe it is something odd with my browser.
This is also what I see. However, looking at the class definition reveals an empty class (other than what may be inherited from V): http://geometrylibrary.geodan.nl/formal_review/linear__ring_8hpp_source.html... 00041 class linear_ring : public V<P, A<P> > 00042 { 00043 BOOST_CONCEPT_ASSERT( (concept::Point<P>) ); 00044 }; Jon
Hi Phil, Jonathan,
I see a page that says "This is the complete list of members for ggl::linear_ring< P, V, ClockWise, A >, including all inherited members.", and is then entirely empty.
Is this what other people see? Maybe it is something odd with my browser.
This is also what I see. However, looking at the class definition reveals an empty class (other than what may be inherited from V):
Sure, it is empty. I agree that the documentation is looking strange then, but this is how it is implemented. A linestring of points is just: a vector of points. A linear ring is just: a vector of points. This both if using default parameter, you can use a deque as well, and set orientation, etc. The traits classes take care that the library sees the necessary difference between a plain vector, a linestring and a linear ring. Regards, Barend
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Barend Gehrels <barend@geodan.nl> wrote:
This is also what I see. However, looking at the class definition reveals an empty class (other than what may be inherited from V):
Sure, it is empty. I agree that the documentation is looking strange then, but this is how it is implemented.
Yeah, I was just pointing out that the page in question is empty because the class in question happens to be empty. This is just an artifact of doxygenation. Thanks for the clarification. Jon
participants (3)
-
Barend Gehrels -
Jonathan Franklin -
Phil Endecott