Re: [boost] Persistency library

Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:29:44 -0400 From: Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Persistency library Message-ID: <m2litdrdyf.fsf@pluto.luannocracy.com> Content-Type: text/plain on Sat Sep 24 2011, "Lifshitz, Yair" <yair.lifshitz-AT-intel.com> wrote:
Hi,
Object-based persistency/serialization libraries often require significant modifications to the code. Would Boost consider adding a process-level checkpointing library to boost?
This is obviously not easily portable, so I understand this is a long shot. If it is relevant, we might contribute a package used by my team that support multiple Linux platforms.
Can it, in principle, be ported to other known platforms?
Yes, it can be ported. However, the porting requires low-level understanding of the target OS/architecture. While our Linux solution is rather portable, porting can (in theory) be non-trivial and require more than just recompilation on another platform. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

on Sun Sep 25 2011, "Lifshitz, Yair" <yair.lifshitz-AT-intel.com> wrote:
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:29:44 -0400 From: Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Persistency library Message-ID: <m2litdrdyf.fsf@pluto.luannocracy.com> Content-Type: text/plain
on Sat Sep 24 2011, "Lifshitz, Yair" <yair.lifshitz-AT-intel.com> wrote:
Hi,
Object-based persistency/serialization libraries often require significant modifications to the code. Would Boost consider adding a process-level checkpointing library to boost?
This is obviously not easily portable, so I understand this is a long shot. If it is relevant, we might contribute a package used by my team that support multiple Linux platforms.
Can it, in principle, be ported to other known platforms?
Yes, it can be ported. However, the porting requires low-level understanding of the target OS/architecture. While our Linux solution is rather portable, porting can (in theory) be non-trivial and require more than just recompilation on another platform.
That's fine; the same applies to a threading library, for example. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
participants (2)
-
Dave Abrahams
-
Lifshitz, Yair