Re: Re: Re: IOStreams formal review -- extended

15 Sep
2004
15 Sep
'04
8:33 p.m.
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote in message news:...
(i) buffering will be omitted, since it's hard to do correctly. (ii) buffering will be provided, but mistakes in pointer arithmetic will cause subtle errors (iii) sub-optimal algorithms will be used.
Note that two of Daryle's stream buffers suffer from defect (i).
I didn't mean to imply that Daryle omitted buffering because it was hard -- I assume he had some other reason. Jonathan
7573
Age (days ago)
7573
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jonathan Turkanis