Kesseli Pascal wrote:

Hi again

I just wanted to inform you that, using the newest library version 1.36, the serialization of all my objects worked perfectly fine :) .

Glad to hear that. Please tell my what your compiler environment was. I also appreciate if you could run the whole serialization library test suite using "library_test". (this is in the trunk/tools ...). I would recommend this before using this code in production. I would be very interested in the results and perhaps might find a way to included in the library status table. I will be updating this package from time to time as I have time. This package contains to big things: thread safety and shared_library safety. Things I would like to add if I had time would be: a)Tests and tweaks to truely make RTTI optional. b)Case study for achive adaptor c)Case study for save/load variable function object d)Case study for delivering DLL for a new datatype within the archive itself. e)Backward versioning f)serialization helper refinement. g)Case study for "editor_archive" so that code edit archives would be generated automatically. I've made this work as a prototype, but it really needs a polished treatment with good document. Alas, I'm kind of busy with a few other projects now. Robert Ramey

The only problem I encountered was a template error in <boost/serialization/utility.hpp> (included by <boost/serialization/map.hpp>). I had to add "#include <boost/mpl/and.hpp>" there for this to compile properly.

Anyways, thanks again for your help :) .

Best regards Kessi

No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.12/1203 - Release Date: 30.12.2007 11:27

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost