[FunctionTypes] Can FunctionTypes be extended to work with Boost.Function?

23 Apr
2011
23 Apr
'11
6:37 p.m.
This is a request to have FunctionTypes extended to work with Boost.Function. According the current documentation, it does not handle the latter. Rationale: I have a template parameter that can be either a function type or a boost::function, and I would like a uniform method to decompose their signature and return type. Note: an alternative does exist where one to specialize on boost::function and carry out around its underlying signature, but that's just an annoying hassle, and, more importantly, it doesn't work if old style syntax for boost::function is used. Thanks, Mostafa
5164
Age (days ago)
5164
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Mostafa